Cases 1 - 10 of 11
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant:
Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Smith v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv12574
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15396
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Glass
as 4:2019cv03228
Petitioner:
Rodney Alphonso Smith
Respondent:
Dale Glass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alphonso Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-40411
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALPHONSO SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00438
Petitioner:
Joseph Alphonso Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Davis
as 3:2016cv00174
Petitioner:
Alphonso Smith
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. MANAYUNK BREWING COMPANY
as 2:2014cv04979
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO SMITH
Defendant:
MANAYUNK BREWING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Woodruff
as 4:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Smith
Defendant:
Douglas Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
