Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 184
KY, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6147
Plaintiff / Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF TENNESSEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS and others
State of Indiana v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4090
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: STATE OF INDIANA
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
BST Holdings, LLC, et al v. OSHA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4080
Not Classified By Court: In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner: BST HOLDINGS, LLC, RV TROSCLAIR, LLC, TROSCLAIR AIRLINE, LLC and others
Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Amicus Curiae: BENTKEY SERVICES, LLC, dba Daily Wire, NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE and AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
BST Holdings, L.L.C. v. OSHA
as 21-60845
Petitioner: BST Holdings, L.L.C., RV Trosclair, L.L.C., Trosclair Airline, L.L.C. and others
Respondent: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae: Bentkey Services, L.L.C., doing business as The Daily Wire, New Civil Liberties Alliance and American Medical Association
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00055
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Ohio, State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, United States of America, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force and others
Amicus Curiae: American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas v. Biden et al Featured Case
as 3:2021cv00309
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant: President Joseph R. Biden, United States Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja and others
Amicus Curiae: American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff: The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, The State of Idaho and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Not Yet Classified: Associated Builders and Contractors of Georgia, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
JOHNSON, JR. v. REV. MOODY et al
as 2:2021cv19426
Plaintiff: CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant: REV. MOODY, JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Mosca v. AMA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2118
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAROL MOSCA
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, c/o James L. Madara, MD, CEO & EVP, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, c/o Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, c/o Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH and others
Adu-Beniako v. Medical Board of California (MDC) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv12410
Plaintiff: Solomon Adu-Beniako
Defendant: Medical Board of California (MDC) and American Medical Association (AMA)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?