Cases 1 - 10 of 401
Andrus v. Commission of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Troy K Andrus
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrus et al v. Spears et al
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Andrus and Kamryn M Andrus
Defendant:
Rose Ann B Spears and Kendra M Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Andrus v. Forrest County Adult Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jared Andrus
Defendant:
Forrest County Adult Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pawley v. Meinhart
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Andrue Pawley
Defendant:
Carol B. Meinhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunlap v. Andrus, et al.
as 24-977
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLAN DUNLAP
Defendant:
CECIL D. ANDRUS, (Deceased) Frm, Idaho State Governor and RAUL LABRADOUR, Attorney General State of Idaho
Park v. Fox et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Nathan Park
Defendant:
Travis Fox, Michelle Fox, Bryant Andrus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
