Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Porter v. USA
as 4:2011cv00656
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Porter
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Porter v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv07630
Petitioner:
Anthony Porter
Respondent:
City of Chicago and The Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Beaton, Sr. v. Franklin Tennis, et al
as 10-3325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS J. BEATON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN TENNIS, Superintendent, JOEL DICKSON, Deputy Superintendent, JAMES MORRIS, Major and others
Curt Porter v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40286
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURT ANTHONY PORTER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Anthony Porter v. Dalia Suliene
as 10-1564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DALIA SULIENE
Wooten et al v. Infinity Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
David B. Wooten, Lisa Wooten, Robert Nastase and others
Defendant:
Infinity Partners, LLC, Infinity Real Estate Partners, LLC, Prudential Source One Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Curt v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
as 6:2009cv00337
Petitioner:
Curt Anthony Porter
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. USA
as 4:2009cv00404
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ahmed, et al v. Porter, et al
as 1:2009cv00101
Plaintiff:
Naseem Ahmed, Tahmeena Ahmed, Gregory Anderson and others
Defendant:
Anthony Porter, United Community Bank, United Community Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PORTER v. PASSAIC CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 2:2009cv00676
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PORTER
Defendant:
PASSAIC CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT., OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER and PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
