Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Doe v. City of Holyoke et al
as 3:2024cv30018
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Holyoke and Anthony Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Fernandez v. Cruz, et al.
as 1:2023cv00855
Plaintiff:
Anthony Soto Fernandez
Defendant:
Pio - Cruz, R. Charles, S. Furlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bailey v. Soto et al
as 2:2022cv05660
Plaintiff:
Mario Bailey
Defendant:
ANTHONY SOTO, Unknown Hooper, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Soto et al
as 1:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Mario Bailey #217000734 and Mario Bailey
Defendant:
Anthony Soto, Unknown Hooper, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Anthony Soto
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soto v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10598
Plaintiff:
Anthony Soto
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soto v. Warden
as 21-2500
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alexander Anthony Soto
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden, NYC Department Corrections
Soto v. Warden, NYC Department Corrections
as 1:2021cv04068
Petitioner:
Alexander Anthony Soto
Respondent:
Warden, NYC Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84688
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK ANTHONY SOTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
