Cases 1 - 10 of 43
WEBB v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2026cv03406
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WEBB
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WEBB v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2026cv01587
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WEBB
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEBB v. LEHNER et al
as 5:2025cv06371
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WEBB
Defendant:
TROOPER STEPHEN M. LEHNER, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JOSEPH C. STAUFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred et al v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12115
Plaintiff:
Audrey Alfred, Shelby Andre, Margie Patton and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Webb v. Beridon et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Webb
Defendant:
Magistrate Thomas O. Beridon, W. Leaman and Attorney W. Scott Leaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08204
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WEBB
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webb v. Wellpath et al
as 4:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Anthony Webb
Defendant:
Wellpath, Regional One Healthcare, Coastal State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Walter Anthony Webb
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WEBB
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
