Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Johnson v. Richland County Jail
as 22-1572
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VERMILLION v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01278
Defendant:
MARTIAL R. KNIESER, PAUL A. TALBOT, MONICA GIPSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., JANE DOE, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamb v. County of Lake et al
as 1:2020cv03592
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services Inc., LT. Ted Uchieck, William Thornton and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overbey v. Jordan et al
as 1:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Corey Overbey
Defendant:
John Jordan, Ruth Ann Dickerson, James Mulcahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowell Jackson v. Eddie Climmer, et al
as 18-35235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL EDWARD JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE CLIMMER, BILL BRADY and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, Inc.
Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv01062
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Inc., Bill Brady and Eddie Climmer
Plaintiff:
Lowell Edward Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bronson v. Helder et al
as 5:2016cv05344
Plaintiff:
Timmy Ray Bronson
Defendant:
Tim Helder , Detention Facility Administrator Jay Cantrell , J. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
