Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Janous v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Frank Donald Janous
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dzinic et al v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10413
Plaintiff:
Sabina Dzinic and Adnan Dzinic
Defendant:
ARAMARK SERVICES INC., Dale Roe, Total Vending and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bybee v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bybee
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and New York Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Rice v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
LaTrecha Rice
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Saulsberry v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff:
Lillian Saulsberry
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaffer v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Floyd v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Curtis Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tankesly Jr v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Ralph Adkinson, Kevin Genovese, Christa Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Clavin Tankesly Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
