Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ROY v. US GOVT AT WHITE HOUSE DC et al
as 2:2015cv03538
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K. ROY
Defendant:
US GOVT AT WHITE HOUSE DC, B. H. OBAMA, DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv01181
Defendant:
Luz Ruiz, Robert ., Eric H Holder, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luevano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Obama et al
as 2:2013cv02023
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
B H Obama
Defendant:
Rick Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roy v. U.S.A. Government et al
as 3:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
Kamal Roy
Defendant:
U.S.A. Government, America First Insurance, All State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hickman v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv01284
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Hickman
Defendant:
B. H. Obama, Eric Holder, Robert Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LUEVANO v. OBAMA et al
as 4:2012cv00153
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, B. H. OBAMA, OFFICE OF THE PARDON ATTORNEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAIME LUEVANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luevano v. Obama et al
as 5:2012cv03256
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
B. H. Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Office of Pardon Attorney, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roy v. Facebook et al
as 1:2012cv00618
Plaintiff:
Kamal K Roy
Defendant:
Facebook, Twitter, U.S.A. Govt, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roy v. NY Department of Licensing Nursing et al
as 1:2011fp00452
Defendant:
NY Department of Licensing Nursing, B. H. Obama, The Associated Press, New York City and others
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. Obama et al
as 8:2009cv01198
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant:
B. H. Obama and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
