Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cato v. McKesson Corporation
as 3:2026cv03174
Plaintiff:
Lewis Cato
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Coleman v. Lewis County et al
as 3:2026cv06135
Plaintiff:
Jordan David Coleman
Defendant:
Lewis County, Robert R. Snaza, Sam Schouten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Gacke et al
as 1:2026cv01697
Plaintiff:
Derick Lewis
Defendant:
Michael Gacke and Kenosha County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Strafford County Superior Court et al
as 1:2026cv00753
Plaintiff:
Allan Lewis
Defendant:
Strafford County Superior Court and FNU Livernois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Seyb v. Labrador, et al.
as 26-6068
Plaintiff:
M.D. STACY SEYB
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF THE IDAHO BOARD OF MEDICINE, in their official capacities, ADAMS COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, ADA COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, in their official capacity and others
Intervenor:
RAUL LABRADOR
Randolph v. Bean, et al.
as 26-6076
Petitioner:
LOUIS RANDOLPH and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
JEREMY BEAN and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Richard Bayson v. Southeast Community College, et al
as 26-2879
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Bayson
Defendant:
Southeast Community College, Ashley Fritz, Todd Klopfenstein and others
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
as 3:2026cv12347
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES GERARD M. GREEN, COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02738
Plaintiff:
Mary Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewis v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv02390
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
