Cases 1 - 10 of 15
UC Funding LLC v. MidAmerican Energy Services LLC
as 3:2022cv01331
Plaintiff:
UC Funding, LLC, d/b/a Wilson Plaza
Defendant:
MidAmerican Energy Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnathan Pinney v. Johnathan James, et al
as 20-2738
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Illinois, Schamoon, Deputy Warden, Lucas Emberton, Sheriff, Van Buren County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnathan Pinney
Trotman v. AM Retail Group, Inc., d/b/a Wilson Leather Outlet
as 4:2020cv00125
Defendant:
AM Retail Group, Inc., d/b/a Wilson Leather Outlet and AM Retail Group, Inc., doing business as Wilsons Leather Outlet
Plaintiff:
Danielle Trotman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Borthwick v. RareCulture, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01973
Defendant:
Marco Beach Hotel, Inc., EOA, Inc., Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Borthwick
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1983
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walker v. Elmore County Sheriff's Department (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lane Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
B J Wilson, Bill Franklin and Deputy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
eDekka LLC v. AM Retail Group, Inc. d/b/a Wilsons Leather
as 2:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
AM Retail Group, Inc. d/b/a Wilsons Leather
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Purtue v. Kearnes et al
as 1:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Purtue
Defendant:
B. Kearnes, G. Eberle, S. Rizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NBG Properties LLC v. Mary B Menish Wilson et al
as 2:2013cv04614
Defendant:
Doe and Mary B Menish Wilson
Plaintiff:
NBG Properties LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
