Cases 41 - 50 of 208
YOUNG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv05207
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
REBECCA B. YOUNG
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carelock v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020cv01635
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Lynnette Patton, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. COOK INCORPORATE ET AL
as 1:2020cv00926
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, et al., COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah B. Young and SARAH YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boone #501976 v. MaCauley et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Joshua Langdon, Bent Simon, Subrina Alken and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Boone #501976
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovings v. Court and Legal Department et al
as 7:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Offender Management Services, Court and Legal Department, Charnelle Newman and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Lovings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Officer Baker
as 19-7844
Defendant / Appellee:
B. MORGAN, NURSE SCALF, J. ELY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7849
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Ely
as 19-7850
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, J. ELY, LIEUTENANT HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Young v. Landry et al
as 3:2019cv00799
Petitioner:
Earl B. Young
Respondent:
Sandy McCain and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meyers v. Baker et al
as 7:2019cv00711
Defendant:
A. Rivero, J. Hounshell, A. Vanhuss and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
