Cases 1 - 10 of 730
Bagley et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10974
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bagley and Kristina Daugirdas
Defendant:
United States of America
Bagley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Lacrista A Bagley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-676
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI, (John Doe)
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WYOMING COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Snyder v. Bagley, et al
as 24-4011
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER
Defendant:
JUDGE MARVIN BAGLEY, individually and in his official capacity as Justice of the Sixth Judicial District Court of Sevier County, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE, LAUARA ANN LISK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Avera Gettysburg et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 0:2023cv03882
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Allergan Finance, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Avera Gettysburg doing business as Avera Gettysburg Hospital, Avera Granite Falls doing business as Avera Granite Falls Health Center, Avera Holy Family doing business as Avera Holy Family Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BAGLEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY A BAGLEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richards et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Sherma Richards, Willis Wynne, Charles Agnello and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
