Cases 1 - 10 of 23
GRANTLEY v. BALTZELL et al
as 3:2026cv01893
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant:
M BALTZELL, H LISKI and G WOMACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANTLEY v. BALTZELL et al
as 3:2025cv01881
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant:
M BALTZELL, WOMACK and H LISKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baltzell v. Connecticut CVS Pharmacy, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jone Baltzell
Defendant:
Connecticut CVS Pharmacy, LLC and Reidville Drive CVS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Baltzell v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 4:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
Alvin Baltzell
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States v. Kenneth McKee, et al
as 20-3671
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles V. Baltzell, Kenneth Scott McKee and Curtis P. Lanham
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Denton v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2020cv05968
Defendant:
T Sharp, Troy Aidan, Ron Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Denton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstead v. Haynes et al
as 3:2020cv05327
Defendant:
Kendra Wakefield, Annice Mizin, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell M Armstead, Jr, Casey Woodson, Justin T Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Berkey et al
as 3:2020cv05251
Defendant:
Dennis Dahne, Timothy Thrasher, Stephen Sinclair and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. Baltzell et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
Jeneva Cotton, Schneider, Brian Schuetter and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stewart et al
as 3:2019cv05096
Defendant:
Stafford Creek Corrections Center, Brian Schuetter, Stephanie Baltzell and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Louis Smith, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
