Cases 51 - 60 of 3,601
Susan Marcos-Chavela v. Barack Obama
as 22-35523
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN MARCOS-CHAVELA
Defendant / Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, former White House occupant
Epperson v. United States
as 22-1384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chris Jonathon Epperson
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, Geoffrey S. Binney, Bill Clinton and others
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology, et al
as 22-55623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHESIOLOGY, CNNA, CDC.GOV, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZERS and others
Glynndeavin Von Fox v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv04314
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
The United States of America, Barack Obama, United States Embassy London and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcos-Chavela v. Obama
as 2:2022cv00853
Defendant:
Barack Obama and John Randal Rusken
Plaintiff:
Susan Marcos-Chavela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Contract
In re: Erick Pringle, et al
as 22-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
In re: ERICK PRINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ELON MUSK, AMAZON INC, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Defendant:
BELLEVUE HOSPITAL NEW YORK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANDREW CUOMO and others
Moussa v. Obama et al
as 1:2022cv04061
Plaintiff:
Momen Mahmoud Moussa
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Christopher Wray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Twitty v. United States, et al
as 22-1127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE J. TWITTY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAY CRIPPS, CELESTE B. RANGEL and others
Bryant v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Winford Bryant
Defendant:
Kim Butler, Barack Obama and Nigel Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furst v. Obama
as 22-610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Ira Furst
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lamont, Governor and State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Barack Obama, President
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
