Cases 1 - 10 of 100
AXIS Surplus Insurance Company et al. v. Millennia Housing Management Ltd. et al.
as 1:2026cv01705
Plaintiff:
AXIS Surplus Insurance Company and Mercer Insurance Company
Defendant:
Millennia Housing Management Ltd., Millennia Housing Development, Ltd., Millennia Housing Capital, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Battiste v. Chrysler Capital
as 4:2026cv00899
Plaintiff:
Dwayne McVeigh Battiste, Sr
Defendant:
Chrysler Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Adjessom et al v. City of Mobile, et al
as 1:2025cv00455
Plaintiff:
Akouvi Adjessom, Sokede Azogba, Christine Adjessom and others
Defendant:
City of Mobile,, Lt. Nick Crepeau, Lt. Kenneth Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Acuna v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12070
Plaintiff:
Donna Acuna, Kaaliym Muhammad, Sharrod Reddy and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Craig Battiste v. James Schiebner
as 25-1709
Petitioner:
CRAIG BATTISTE
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
Battiste v. Rardin
as 2:2025cv11992
Petitioner:
Martin Battiste
Respondent:
Eric Rardin
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Craig Battiste v. James Schiebner
as 25-1548
Petitioner:
CRAIG BATTISTE
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Battiste v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv00640
Plaintiff:
Lenore Battiste
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Battiste v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Anthony Battiste
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
