Cases 1 - 10 of 260
Beatty
as 1:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Beatty
Defendant:
Peoria County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Morrill v. Aarhaus et al
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
David Morrill
Defendant:
Alyssa Aarhaus, Bren Rogers, Charles Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCleary v. Nelmark et al
as 9:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jaysen McCleary
Defendant:
David Nelmark and Scott Beattie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Booker v. Toal et al
as 3:2023cv06187
Plaintiff:
Patrick Booker
Defendant:
Jean Toal, Costa Pleicones, Donald Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Travis Jones v. Supervising Clerk of District Court of Maryland
as 23-2032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS EVERETT JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERVISING CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND, T. RICHARDSON, COMMISSIONER HESNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mao Cardenas et al v. County of Ventura, et al
as 2:2023cv05482
Plaintiff:
Mao Cardenas and Estate of Tomoko Hoetzlein
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VENTURA,, Sevet Johnson, CITY OF CAMARILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
