Cases 11 - 20 of 6,209
Cassel v. Todd et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Ashley L. Cassel
Defendant:
Tristen Todd, Karen Bishop, Rebecca Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ledet v. State of Louisiana
as 24-30277
Plaintiff:
Michael Ledet
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, through Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Christopher Eskew, Lieutenant Colonel, Emily Bishop and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Zelesnik v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Joe Citero, John Rice and others
Bishop et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01952
Plaintiff:
The Estate of William Bishop and Latrisha Bishop
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whithehorn (PS) v. McCann et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Byron L. Whithehorn
Defendant:
Beth (I) McCann, Beth McCann, Lara (I) Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Bishop
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bishop v. Erie Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Brent Bishop
Defendant:
Erie Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
