Cases 21 - 30 of 1,970
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Botero v. The Grove Hauling et al
as 4:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Laura Botero
Defendant:
The Grove Hauling and Larry Gene Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00689
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weidner Apartment Homes v. Jordan Bonner et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Weidner Apartment Homes
Defendant:
Jordan Bonner, Serena Straka, Laurent Surterre and others
BONNER v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
CORNEL BONNER
Defendant:
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bonner v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01304
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Bonner
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Holmes v. Precythe et al
as 6:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Michelle Buckner, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Allen Carpenter
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
Eads v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
