Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brandon Ramirez v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis-Marion County, et al
as 26-2276
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RAMIREZ
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY, SCOTT HARTMAN, ZACHARY TAYLOR and others
Ramirez v. Contra Costa County
as 5:2025cv08554
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ramirez
Defendant:
Contra Costa County, M.D.F., W.C.D.F. Contra Costa Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. NEXSTAR MEDIA INC. et al
as 1:2025cv00249
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ramirez
Defendant:
NEXSTAR MEDIA INC. and SCRIPPS MEDIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
RAMIREZ v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RAMIREZ
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ANTHONY MACLEMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Ramirez v. DRS Contracting, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv03188
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ramirez
Defendant:
DRS Contracting, LLC and Chad Mellentine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nelson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2021cv01507
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Charles Lucas, Michael Soriano and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Nelson and Jose Roel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78081
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2011cv01064
Defendant:
Mariana Campos, Norma Greenfield, Brandon Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisa Ramirez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv07359
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Does, Hacienda La Puente School District and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Fernandez, Marie Hernandez, C. L. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
