Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,773
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff: Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant: Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tetmeyer v. City of Indianapolis et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff: William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant: City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02090
Plaintiff: Angelia Evette Bryant
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner-Bryant v. LOreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03470
Plaintiff: Lisa Lesane Turner-Bryant
Defendant: LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen - Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Evans v. USA
as 24-40300
Plaintiff: Christy G. Evans
Defendant: United States of America, Lisa Greenway, Carrie Gilliam and others
USA v. Brandon Bryant
as 24-3360
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRANDON BRYANT
Muhammad Bryant v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2024cv03265
Plaintiff: Al-Akhir Islam Muhammad Bryant
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05322
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01846
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Griffin v. USA
as 0:2024cv01563
Petitioner: Bryant Duane Griffin
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?