Cases 1 - 10 of 2,329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Delacruz v. Ricci et al
as 9:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Delacruz
Defendant:
C.O. Brendan Ricci, C.O. Todd Shoemaker, C.O. Dustin Vanhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Smith
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Karmen Penrose, Kannitha West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Windeknecht v. Bullock et al
as 4:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Defendant:
Mr. Christopher Bullock, Chief of St. Francois Police Dept., Mr. Michael Blake Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bullock v. Hockley County Jail
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bullock
Defendant:
Hockley County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
