Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JERNIGAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
LARIS BRITTON JERNIGAN, XUAN THI TRAN and NHAN QUANG BAO TRAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, SUSAN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Global Merchandising Services, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, CarrLucienqUcYr, DBsdkaow and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00282
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Bao-Tran Abbie Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caci, Inc. - Federal v. Ngo
as 1:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Caci, Inc. - Federal
Defendant:
Bao-Tran X Ngo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Thai Bao Tran v. Ken Clark
as 09-55729
Petitioner - Appellant:
THAI BAO TRAN
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Jonathan Riches v. Guy Tooker
as 08-7529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
GUY WILLARD TOOKER and BAO TRAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
