Cases 31 - 40 of 243
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Shea et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
Raymond Edward Shea, Pauline D. Shea, USA Health University Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Tarren Clark v. Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center et al
as 2:2021cv09569
Plaintiff:
Tarren Clark
Defendant:
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Dr. Carl Fleischer, Dr. Barry Guze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: In the Matter of Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum Served Upon Missouri Baptist Medical Center
as 4:2021mc01049
Petitioner:
Missouri Baptist Medical Center and Missouri Baptist Hospital - Sullivan
Respondent:
U. S. Department of Justice
Alexander-Guerrier et al v. Kramer
as 2:2021cv01512
Plaintiff:
Dr Dorothy Alexander-Guerrier, Jane Doe Minor Child F, Jane Doe Minor Child A and others
Defendant:
James R Kramer, Nancy Buckner, Jill Tarte Karle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
US v. Cadden
as 21-1602
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
US v. Chin
as 21-1574
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GLENN A. CHIN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
