Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BARROW v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. et al
as 3:2026cv08705
Plaintiff:
ANITA BARROW
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Truist Bank v. Barrows et al
as 1:2026cv13175
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank
Defendant:
Emanuel Barrows, Martins Brother Construction, Inc. and Alberto Martins
Interested Party:
BayCoast Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Donnell Barrow v. United States
as 26-2305
Petitioner:
Donnell Barrow
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wheeler v. Carver et al
as 1:2026cv00364
Petitioner:
Bradley Wheeler
Respondent:
Alicia Carver, Nicodemus, McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrow v. Red Violet, Inc.
as 1:2026cv02234
Plaintiff:
Bradley Barrow
Defendant:
Red Violet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gilliam-Perkins v. Barrows et al
as 2:2026cv11581
Plaintiff:
Pierre Gilliam-Perkins
Defendant:
Barrows, Maxon, St. Louis Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States v. Danny Barrows
as 26-1898
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danny Trent Barrows
AFICA v. Oncor Electric
as 26-10393
Plaintiff:
Accident Fund Insurance Company of America, Victor Quantinilla and Oscar Interiano Rosales
Defendant:
Oncor Electric Delivery Company, L.L.C. and Wade Austin Barrow
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
