Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Alphonso Bell v. Moore
as 24-6408
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO BELL, SR.
Defendant:
MOORE, Deputy, HIRST, Lt. Sheriff, DOLAN, Nurse, Wellpath and others
Brown v. Jenkins et al
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
David F. Brown
Defendant:
Scott Jenkins, Dale Durrer, Carson Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Moore, Hirst, Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Herring v. City of Estill et al
as 9:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Siwand Herring
Defendant:
City of Estill, City of Estill d/b/a Estill Police Department, Chauncey Solomon Individually and as an Employee/Agent of City of Estill and City of Estill d/b/a Estill Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Roger Beard v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Calvin Beard
as 24-6004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CALVIN BRUCE BEARD, a/k/a 40 Cal
BEARD v. VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING, LLC
as 1:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
ERIC BEARD
Defendant:
VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Beard v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv02574
Petitioner:
Wendell Beard
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beard v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Dale Bernard Beard, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel E. Smith and Cpl. Adam Albaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
