Cases 1 - 10 of 523
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beckett v. Closton et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Rahmik Beckett
Defendant:
Sgt. Closton, Correctional Officer Hall and Lt. Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harry BeckettIn re: Harry Beckett
as 24-1474
Petitioner:
In re: HARRY L. BECKETT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Vincent Wilson v. Luduena Morales
as 24-6102
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
LUDUENA MORALES, Deputy, #361, LIEUTENANT DOZIER, #968, J. BURGESS, Major, #685 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Beckett v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Corbett
as 24-224
Defendant:
QAWON ALLEN, DESMONN BECKETT, DEVON BRISTOL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TYSHAWN CORBETT and Reck
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Probst v. Beckett
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
James Edward Probst
Defendant:
A Beckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fillmore v. State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County et al
as 0:2024cv60132
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Fillmore
Defendant:
State of Florida Prosecutor's Office for Broward County, Michael J. Satz, Christina Strandell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
