Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Denison (PS) v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2025cv02736
Plaintiff:
Jeremy N. Denison
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Warden of Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility, Beise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marion Frye v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 25-6519
Plaintiff:
MARION WADE FRYE
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR BRYAN STERLING, KENNETH NELSON and others
Denison (PS) v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2025cv00827
Plaintiff:
Jeremy N. Denison
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Warden of Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility and Beise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frye v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 5:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Marion Wade Frye
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Director Bryan Sterling, Kenneth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beise v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01487
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Beise
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madrid v. Jeter et al
as 4:2013cv00041
Defendant:
Michelle Beise, Rodger Bowers, Imer Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Mike Madrid, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beise et al v. Oakley National Bank of Buffalo/KleinBank, The et al
as 0:2011cv01276
Plaintiff:
Dennis A. Beise and Janet A. Beise
Defendant:
Oakley National Bank of Buffalo/KleinBank, The , Pfeifer Property Management LLC and John or Jane Does 1-1000
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
