Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Benner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01749
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Anne Benner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Arnold v. SCI-Benner Prison et al
as 1:2026cv02071
Plaintiff:
Dale R. Arnold
Defendant:
SCI-Benner Prison and Warden Booher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05436
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Fairbanks et al v. J.A. Benner Limited
as 0:2026cv02809
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fairbanks, Jason Damman, Colin Beere and others
Defendant:
J.A. Benner Limited doing business as Systems Management & Balancing of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Benner v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 0:2026cv02638
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Benner
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
VICTOR v. BICKELL et al
as 3:2026cv01096
Plaintiff:
William Victor
Defendant:
Bickell, Wenorwicz, C/O Gourley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Antwan Richardson v. Jon Altemus, et al
as 26-1623
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
JON ALTEMUS, BALLIER, BEAN and others
Howard Jones Investments, LLC, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al.
as 26-1618
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JONES INVESTMENTS, LLC, LOWELLA OLDHAM, DOLLY LEEPER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATT ARMSTRONG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
