Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Moncavage v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2026cv00751
Plaintiff:
Dave Mark Moncavage
Defendant:
Scott Ceresini, Russell Frederick, Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minor et al v. Bauer et al
as 4:2026cv04992
Plaintiff:
Gary Minor and Evelyn Benton Gray
Defendant:
Martin Bauer, Martin, Pringle Oliver, Wallace & Bauer LLP, Robb Rumsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Adair v. Shell Oil Company et al
as 2:2026cv01355
Plaintiff:
Michael Adair
Defendant:
Shell Oil Company, Shell Norco Refining Company, Borden Chemical Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Benton v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00062
Plaintiff:
Anna Bush Benton
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Muwsay Tulu v. H. Williams
as 26-6694
Plaintiff:
MUWSAY IBN IBRAHIM TULU
Defendant:
H. P. WILLIAMS and PATRICK BENTON WEEDE
Benton v. Davis et al
as 2:2026cv01050
Plaintiff:
Corey Eugene Benton
Defendant:
Kechia Davis, Jaqueline Anderson Smith, Natelie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Benton County Circut Court
as 6:2026cv01204
Plaintiff:
Alex Verlyn Lyle Rice
Defendant:
Benton County Circut Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Benton County Jail
as 6:2026cv01195
Plaintiff:
Alex Verlyn Lyle Rice
Defendant:
Benton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
