Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gaines v. Tolefree
as 3:2026cv00257
Plaintiff:
Bernard Akreem Gaines
Defendant:
Yenetta Tolefree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fraction v. Legal Aid of Nebraska et al
as 8:2026cv00311
Plaintiff:
Bernard Fraction
Defendant:
Legal Aid of Nebraska and Tim Dolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00334
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Golden v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv02775
Plaintiff:
Jervell Bernard Golden
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, Anthony Alexander and Mark Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard et al v. City Of Oakland
as 4:2026cv06551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bernard and Lynn Warner
Defendant:
City Of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Leonard Gregory
as 26-4332
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LEONARD BERNARD GREGORY
St. John v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority et al.
as 1:2026cv01457
Plaintiff:
Lars St. John
Defendant:
Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority, Jeffrey K. Patterson, Sharonda N. Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephenson v. Alvarez et al
as 6:2026cv00218
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dale Bernard Stephenson
Defendant:
Chrystal Alvarez, Michell Carter, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hansen v. Pate
as 3:2026cv02067
Petitioner:
Bernard Ross Hansen
Respondent:
Nathan Pate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv01720
Plaintiff:
Bernard White
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
