Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Monroe v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
as 6:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
Billie Monroe
Defendant:
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blanks et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
Helen McKoy Blanks , Kandace Blanks , Master Blanks and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe v. Poret et al
as 3:2013cv00376
Defendant:
Cyndia Aquilina, James Cruze, Troy Poret and others
Interested Party:
William Kline
Plaintiff:
Billy Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Lantrip
as 13-7026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY MONROE HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA LANTRIP, AKA Linda Landtrip
MONROE v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC
as 2:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
BILLIE MONROE
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Jones et al
as 6:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
Billy Monroe Hicks
Defendant:
Justin Jones and Linda Landtrip
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYNES et al v. FLUOR DANIEL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93286
Plaintiff:
BILLY MONROE HAYNES, SR. and PAULA KEPLEY HAYNES
Defendant:
FLUOR DANIEL, INC. , FLUOR DANIEL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. , FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hicks v. Jones et al
as 6:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
Billy Monroe Hicks
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Randy Workman, Debbie Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Jones, et al
as 08-7099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY MONROE HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, DOC Director, MARTY SIRMONS, OSP Warden, MIKE PRUITT, OSP Unit Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
