Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03267
Plaintiff:
BILLY COLEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv14752
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BILLIE COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feher et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv13451
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Feher, JOSE GOMEZ, Trinidad Acosta and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feher et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Byrd, Hope Colling, Angela Bomba and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Union, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries, PTI Royston, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 6:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Billie Coleman and David Coleman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Cintas Corporation No 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Coleman v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
Billy Coleman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
US v. Coleman
as 07-7310
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARTHUR BILLY COLEMAN, a/k/a James Eric Nash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
