Cases 81 - 90 of 1,208
Blevins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv03540
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Blevins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BLEVINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08752
Plaintiff:
TODD BLEVINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blevins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
George Blevins and Carol Blevins
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Thomas Blevins v. Danny King
as 23-6338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BLEVINS, a/k/a Tommy Ray Blevins
Defendant / Appellee:
DANNY KING, Jail Administrator and FERNIE HYMAN, Food Service Manager
Bell v. Owensboro Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Eric Antonio Bell
Defendant:
Owensboro Police Department, C.O. Blevins, C.O. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
BLEVINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06421
Plaintiff:
DONALD BLEVINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hokamp, Pamela v. Blevins, Erman et al
as 3:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jean Hokamp
Defendant:
Erman Blevins, Sergeant Cornette, Ross Radthke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandy Sedlick et al v. City of Redlands et al
as 5:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Sandy Sedlick and Joseph Sedlick
Defendant:
City of Redlands, Tyler Frisch, Yessenia Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blevins v. Portis et al
as 1:2023cv10561
Plaintiff:
Sarina Blevins
Defendant:
Tanasia Portis and Helen A Brown Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
