Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kyle v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2026cv03482
Defendant:
FNU Barban, FNU Wright, FNU Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher M. Kyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander Goddard-Tucker v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2026cv03446
Plaintiff:
Ashley Goddard-Tucker
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, Wellpath Liquidating Trust, Shelby County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonner v. Christian Care et al
as 4:2026cv04264
Plaintiff:
Darnell Robert Bonner
Defendant:
Christian Care, . Frank and . Zach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv13013
Plaintiff:
Debra Bonner
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bonner v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv09345
Plaintiff:
Gary Bonner
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Bonner v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01507
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bonner
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Armstrong v. Bonner et al
as 2:2026cv03362
Plaintiff:
Ray Armstrong
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Chief Jennie Rudd, Chief Kirk Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luster v. Contra Costa Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2026cv11972
Plaintiff:
Justin Tyrell Luster
Defendant:
Contra Costa Sheriff's Department, Contra Costa Health Services, West County Detention Facility (WCDF) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Bonner v. Curtis Early
as 26-7076
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ANDROPLUS BONNER
Respondent:
WARDEN CURTIS EARLY
Lofton v. Ng, et al.
as 26-6601
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LOFTON
Defendant:
CHRISTINE NG, ANNA BREWER, LAURA BONNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
