Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Negron et al v. Bonner et al
as 1:2026cv13159
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron
Defendant:
Charlene Bonner, Angelo Gomez Jr., Suzan Colletet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonner v. Hicks et al
as 4:2026cv02715
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamone Bonner
Defendant:
John Hicks and Sheriff Breeden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bonner v. Ditzhazy
as 2:2026cv12194
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bonner
Defendant:
Jake Ditzhazy and Dakota Bakka
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Bonner v. Gondek
as 2:2026cv12157
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bonner
Defendant:
Mike Gondek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonner v. Hilden et al
as 2:2026cv12065
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bonner
Defendant:
Spencer Hilden and Jase Paciocco
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Marilyn Donald, et al v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 26-5534
Plaintiff:
MARILYN DONALD, as next-of-kin and wrongful death representative of the late MARCUS DONALD, in her individual capacity and CHARLES DONALD, as next-of-kin and wrongful death representative of the late MARCUS DONALD, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., KIRK FIELDS, SHELBY COUNTY, TN and others
Soper et al v. Broton et al
as 7:2026cv01024
Plaintiff:
Bryanna Soper and Faith Blake
Defendant:
Broton, T Garner, Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2026cv02651
Plaintiff:
Betty Olivo Williams
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02992
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
