Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Boulden v. Jenkins
as 1:2016cv03087
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Boulden
Defendant:
Matthew G. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAGLIALATELA v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA et al
as 2:2016cv01319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. TAGLIALATELA, JR.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, DEBRA ZITOMER, R. DOUGLAS BILLET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OFISI et al v. BNP PARIBAS S.A. et al
as 1:2015cv02010
Plaintiff:
MARY OFISI , AARON MAKAU NDIVO , ADAM TITUS WAMAI and others
Defendant:
BNP PARIBAS, S.A. and AL SHAMAL ISLAMIC BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USAA General Indemnity Company v. Boulden Inc.
as 1:2014cv01290
Plaintiff:
USAA General Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Boulden Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boulden v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv04124
Plaintiff:
Curtis G. Boulden
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Damiani v. Delaware State Police Troop 2 et al
as 1:2012cv01637
Plaintiff:
Pablo A. Damiani
Defendant:
Delaware State Police Troop 2, Detective Duffy, Detective Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
LYONS v. BOULDEN, INC.
as 2:2011cv07484
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. LYONS
Defendant:
BOULDEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 4:2011cv03010
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyd's , Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. , Keith Toliver and others
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Lopez and Teresa Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillip H. Boulden et al v. Aurora Loan Services LLC Company et al
as 5:2011cv01110
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC Company, Lehman Brothers Bank FSB, Tom Wind and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Boulden and Phillip H Boulden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
