Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ANSLY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2026cv06805
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ANSLY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY LISA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyle v. Bohinski et al
as 1:2026cv02574
Petitioner:
Gerald James Boyle
Respondent:
Jasen Bohinski and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gauros v. Boyles
as 3:2026cv01834
Petitioner:
Jacarri Gauros
Respondent:
Audrey J. Boyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Durrah v. Campbell County et al
as 2:2026cv00256
Defendant:
Mara Donathon, Marlene Sharpe, Ryan Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Durrah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Boyle et al v. Edlow
as 2:2026cv02446
Plaintiff:
Brendan P Boyle and Marcos Luis De Oliveira
Defendant:
Director Joseph B. Edlow
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Peter Vega v. John Wetzel, et al
as 26-3135
Plaintiff:
PETER VEGA
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Former Secretary for PA/DOC, DR. BADICK, Former Director of Health Care Services at Mahanoy, DR. BORA, Director of Health Care Services at Mahanoy and others
Boyle v. Keller et al
as 3:2026cv01115
Plaintiff:
Gary Boyle
Defendant:
Keller, C Sanders, Ms Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
