Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dixon v. American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv03810
Plaintiff:
Brenda Dixon
Defendant:
American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nolon v. Owens et al
as 5:2021ct03110
Plaintiff:
Ardie D. Nolon and Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
Lerohn Litinchum, Tawana Freeman, Carie Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv02373
Plaintiff:
BRENDA DIXON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11625
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Plaintiff:
BRENDA DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00024
Plaintiff:
Brenda Dixon , Charlie Joe Dixon, Jr , Robert Dixon and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Johnny Ollis v. Litonya Carter
as 16-6997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY CALVIN OLLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LITONYA CARTER, GEORGE SOLOMON, KAREN BROWN and others
Defendant:
DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION, Department of Public Safety
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dixon v. Cummins Bridgeway, LLC
as 2:2015cv10063
Plaintiff:
Brenda Dixon
Defendant:
Cummins Bridgeway, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Ollis v. Carter et al
as 5:2014ct03248
Plaintiff:
Johnny Calvin Ollis
Defendant:
Litonya Carter, George Solomon, Karen Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
