Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Reilly et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv04173
Plaintiff:
Brendan Reilly and Tiffany Reilly
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bottled Blonde Chicago, LLC v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv03217
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Rahm Emanuel , Local Liquor Control Commission of the City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Bottled Blonde Chicago, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. City of Chicago Park District et al
as 1:2015cv03014
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Park District, Bryan Traubert, Avis LaVelle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights et al v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv07749
Plaintiff:
Committe to Preserve Voting Rights, Bruce E. Crosby, William K. Crosby and others
Defendant:
Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, Langdon D. Neal, Richard A. Cowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Perez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02571
Plaintiff:
Jose Perez
Defendant:
City of New York , Brendan Reilly, William Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onorato v. Reilly
as 3:2011cv01707
Plaintiff:
Frederick J. Onorato
Defendant:
Brendan Reilly
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Elliott et al v. Reilly et al
as 1:2011cv00958
Plaintiff:
James Elliott and SiRRAN Communications Inc.
Defendant:
Brendan Reilly , SiRRAN Communications USA Inc., SiRRAN Communications LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Cook County et al
as 3:2010cv00034
Petitioner:
Jesse Phillips and Jesse Phillips
Respondent:
Ruth Rothstein, Thomas Dart, Michael Sheahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
Micheal Chertoff, Deval Patrick, Tim Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
