Cases 1 - 10 of 52
United States of America v. Ebady (Tsikman)
as 26-2011
Defendant:
HAFIZULLAH EBADY, DELA SAIDAZIM, DAVID GARY BISHOFF and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Department of Adult Correction
as 5:2026ct03204
Plaintiff:
Brett Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Ebady
as 26-1418
Defendant:
DELA SAIDAZIM, DAVID GARY BISHOFF, BRYCEN MILLETT and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ebady (Tsikman)
as 26-1368
Defendant:
DELA SAIDAZIM, DAVID GARY BISHOFF, HERSHEL TSIKMAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fusilier v. City of Wichita Police Department, et al
as 26-3097
Plaintiff:
KAREN M. FUSILIER
Defendant:
WICHITA POLICE DEPARTMENT, EDWARD BROWER, CORRIE MCCLUSKEY and others
Fusilier v. Wichita, Kansas, City of, Police Department et al
as 6:2025cv01292
Defendant:
Wichita, Kansas, City of, Police Department, Edward Brower, Corrie McCluskey and others
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Fusilier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brett Johnson v. KW Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2025cv08448
Plaintiff:
Brett Johnson
Defendant:
KW Specialty Insurance Company and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
JOHNSON v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2025cv00615
Plaintiff:
BRETT JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2025cv00616
Plaintiff:
BRETT JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons et al v. City of Hurricane et al
as 3:2025cv00345
Plaintiff:
Tearria Simmons, Clinton Simmons, A. B. P. and others
Defendant:
City of Hurricane, Scott Edwards, Chief Michael Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
