Cases 11 - 20 of 135
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97772
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LEWIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anne Block v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al
as 20-35025
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDA LOEN, individually, and in her capacity as defendant City of Gold Bar Mayor and Public Records Officer, KALI MATUSKA, individually, and in her official capacity as an employee of defendant Port of Seattle, JOHN LOVICK, individually, and in his official capacity as an employee of defendant Snohomish County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNE BLOCK, Esquire, an individual
NYE v. SHAPIRO et al
as 3:2019cv00218
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, LEO DUNN and JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
BRIAN LEWIS NYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simkins v. McIntosh et al
as 3:2019cv00227
Defendant:
Joshua Spears, Adan Fuentes, Grandview Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Simkins, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
Brian Lewis Lay
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Khan
as 3:2019cv01254
Plaintiff:
Brian Lewis
Defendant:
Alan Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Simkins v. Grandview Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Defendant:
Curt Sulte, Indiana Neuroscience Associates, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Simkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Woods v. Maryville Academy et al
as 1:2017cv08273
Plaintiff:
Harlis Woods
Defendant:
Maryville Academy, Board of Directors for Maryville Academy in 1995, David P Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
