Cases 1 - 10 of 28
BANKS et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2026cv00313
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE BANKS, AHMAD SALAAH, ALISHA LIPSCOMB and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Adair et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12226
Plaintiff:
Theodore Adair, Charles Addis, George Alig and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Clariant Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Yrigollen et al
as 4:2024cv00487
Defendant:
Kyle Yrigollen, Warden (2010-2012), Warden (2010) and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(HC) Clark v. Warden, FCI Mendota
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
Russel Bruce Clark
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
In re: Bruce Reliford
as 19-6314
Petitioner:
In re: BRUCE CLARK RELIFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Redford v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2019cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jay Redford
Defendant:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bruce Clark, BLM Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
In re: Bruce Reliford
as 19-5193
Petitioner:
In re: BRUCE CLARK RELIFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ahlers et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11484
Plaintiff:
Claire Mulcahy, Migdalia Alvarez-Adorno, Christopher McInerney and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
US v. Bruce Gillespie
as 17-4576
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRUCE CLARK GILLESPIE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
