Cases 1 - 10 of 410
USA v. Nathaniel Rimpson, III, et al
as 24-1926
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHANIEL RIMPSON, III, CHARLES SCOTT and CARL BUGGS
Bosselman et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03316
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Bosselman, Carrie Coakley, Van McClees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Buggs v. Leslie et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00270
Defendant:
Donna Leslie, Montgomery Area Mental Health Authority and Steve Marshall
Plaintiff:
Dynassus Buggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Glenn Cook
Defendant:
USA, Dr. R. Pass, L. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bugg v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rayshaun D. Bugg
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wolfe v. Azcarate et al
as 1:2023cv01711
Plaintiff:
John Michael Wolfe
Defendant:
Penney S. Azcarate, Randy I. Bellows, Robert J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Buggs
as 3:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keyundrea Buggs
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
McCaffety v. Hanson et al
as 4:2023cv04019
Plaintiff:
Don McCaffety
Defendant:
Kelsey Hanson, Jodi Watkins, Randy Parasiliti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
