Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Burnell v. Andrews
as 2:2020cv00628
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Petitioner:
Jamal Dontae Burnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burnell v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00599
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate et al v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ceclia Tate
Defendant:
Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does, Wendy Kelley and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jiles, Jr, Elijah McAlister, A Biddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnell v. Liberty Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00103
Defendant:
Ciara B Tanner, Logan E Pickett and Liberty Police Department
Plaintiff:
James Burnell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Miller et al
as 9:2019cv00968
Defendant:
C.O. Sexton, C.O. Burnell, Ms. Caron and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodson v. Benton et al
as 4:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
Gregory Burnell Goodson
Defendant:
Jamie Lecount and Brooke Benton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Kincade et al
as 2:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Ms. Burnell, Vera Giles, Stacy Kincade and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnell v. USA
as 2:2018cv00623
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jamal Dontae Burnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams et al v. Simmons et al
as 1:2018cv06912
Respondent:
Douglas Simmons and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Petitioner:
Burnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph v. Annucci et al
as 7:2018cv07197
Defendant:
Gail Williams, Lane Kortright, Samuel Encarnacion and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
