Cases 1 - 10 of 243,177
Reece et al v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Reece and Joseph C Reece
Defendant:
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, Community Insurance Company d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERCADO v. Centerstone Recovery Center et al
as 1:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO
Defendant:
Centerstone Recovery Center and Cassie Molitor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Myers
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lee v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Lula Lee
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana Inc, Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc and Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
STOKES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MELVIN C STOKES, JR
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Not Yet Classified:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff:
James Lucien
Defendant:
John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
