Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Abdullah v. City of Niagara Falls
as 21-285
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Marcus Caldwell, Michael D. Nalls, Catrice Byrd-Pippens and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of Niagara Falls, Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Hooker Chemicals and Plastics Corporation and others
BURCH v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00434
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lexon Insurance Company v. Brandon et al
as 2:2020cv02178
Plaintiff:
Lexon Insurance Company
Defendant:
Merit Associates Inc, Lisa H Brandon, Stacey C Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terrance Johnson v. C. Burch
as 20-15160
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRANCE GREEN JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
C. BURCH
Abdullah et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00145
Plaintiff:
Estilleta C. Burch, Debra Crowell, Jillian Carol Horner and others
Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Burch
as 4:2019cv00513
Respondent:
C Burch
Petitioner:
Terrance Green Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Burch
as 4:2019cv00108
Respondent:
C Burch
Petitioner:
Terrance Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonnell et al v. Burch et al
as 3:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. McDonnell, III and CLM Rentals, Inc.
Defendant:
William C. Burch, III, Merit Associates, Inc. and W. Scott Brandon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Peters et al
as 1:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Noel Diaz
Defendant:
Angelo A. Peters, Christopher Norton, Joshua M. Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
