Cases 1 - 10 of 325
Hall v. Target Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Ramona C Hall
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Dayton Hudson Corporation and Mason Asset Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Starr v. Hall
as 8:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Eddie Starr
Defendant:
Geoffrey C. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Hall v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Caroline C Hall and Caroline C. Hall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Hall et al v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
Royce Hall, Delbert Royce Hall and Sandy C. Hall
Defendant:
John A Crane, Jerry Jones, Antoinette Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Crane et al v. Hall-Jenkins et al
as 1:2023cv01477
Defendant:
John Crane, Jerry Jones, Antoinette Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Hall-Jenkins, Royce Hall and Sandy C. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HALL v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv21829
Plaintiff:
LAUREN C. HALL
Defendant:
AETNA and NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
