Cases 1 - 10 of 16
John Golub, et al v. Gigamon Inc., et al
as 19-16975
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. HOOPER, ELLIOTT ASSOCIATES, L.P., PAUL E. MILBURY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. GOLUB, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CARPENTER
Bushansky v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv06842
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Tonfack v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06845
Plaintiff:
Fulgence Tonfack
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Paul A. Hooper, Arthur W. Coviello, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stouffer v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv06789
Plaintiff:
Spencer Stouffer
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sharpenter v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv06755
Plaintiff:
Ted Sharpenter
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KALT v. GIGAMON INC. et al
as 4:2017cv06713
Plaintiff:
DAVID KALT
Defendant:
GIGAMON INC., PAUL A. HOOPER, ARTHUR W. COVIELLO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kalt v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06672
Plaintiff:
David Kalt
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Paul A. Hooper, Arthur W. Coviello, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carpenter v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv06653
Plaintiff:
Brian Carpenter
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ho v. Pinsukanjana, et al.
as 5:2017cv06520
Plaintiff:
Rita C Ho
Defendant:
Mark Pinsukanjana , Bryan Yedinak and Architektur
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Krachman v. Ho, M.D. et al
as 1:2011cv04234
Plaintiff:
Monica Krachman
Defendant:
Charles C. Ho, M.D. and Marietta Eye Clinic, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
