Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Walker v. D.O.C. Security Operations et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reginald Walker
Defendant:
D.O.C. Security Operations, Secretary of DPSCS, Executive Director Inmate Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Northam et al
as 7:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
Ralph Northam, Glenn Youngkin, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia et al
as 3:2019cv00038
Defendant:
L. D. Britt, Babur B. Lateef, James V. Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hart v. Roderick et al
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lekai Hart
Defendant:
R. Roderick, J. McMahan, Prosper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Deborah C. Walker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Walker et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06869
Plaintiff:
Claudia C. Walker and Charles R. Walker
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02969
Plaintiff:
Elaine C. Walker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re The West Virginia State Bar v. Ferguson
as 2:2012mc00033
Petitioner:
The West Virginia State Bar
Respondent:
C. Walker Ferguson, IV
Galo v. Walker et al
as 5:2011ct03023
Plaintiff:
Andrew F. Galo
Defendant:
C. Walker, Officer Judkins and V. Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
