Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Kavin Peeples v. David Conley
as 23-3113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAVIN LEE PEEPLES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID C. CONLEY
Peeples v. Conley
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Kavin Lee Peeples
Defendant:
David C. Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peeples v. Conley
as 1:2022cv00622
Plaintiff:
Kavin Lee Peeples
Defendant:
David C. Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07779
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Coverdale v. Conley
as 1:2019cv00920
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Coverdale
Defendant:
David C Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 1:2018cv46138
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bolton and Angel Bolton
Bolton et al v. Bynes, Jr et al
as 4:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
Angel Bolton and Christopher Bolton
Defendant:
Frank H. Bynes, Jr, Curtis V. Cooper Primary Health Care, Inc. , Pembroke Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Russell v. Whelan et al
as 2:2016cv01929
Defendant:
C. Conley, J. Dafoe, C. Dieter and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv09831
Plaintiff:
Betty M. Conley and William C. Conley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MultiPlast Systems, Inc. v. EDS Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13987
Plaintiff:
MultiPlast Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
EDS Group, Inc. , Sierra Resins, Inc. , Stephen C. Conley and others
Counter_claimant:
Stephen C. Conley , Sierra Resins, Inc. , EDS Group, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
MultiPlast Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
